The Need For a Boy Scout
Issue   |   Wed, 03/14/2012 - 02:28

The Arizona Republican debate a few weeks ago illustrated some interesting things. Certainly much of the usual sparring ensued, but there was something Rick Santorum said which could potentially have a massive impact on the GOP and presidential race. Though he may not realize this, he finally got the Conservative message right.

Santorum had made some controversial statements on contraception in the preceding weeks and was asked to clarify his position by the moderator. Birth control, of course, is a fiercely controversial and divisive issue, especially in the wake of President Obama’s healthcare contraception requirement for Catholic churches (a complicated issue that can’t fully be explored here). This conflict targets liberal views on contraception and is thus dangerous moral ground for any politician.

Santorum was inches away from calling many couples in the populace downright immoral. But the beauty was in the way he handled the question. At long last, he said what conservatives want to hear. But he also took a position that liberals could tolerate, thereby making him a viable candidate. Santorum said that he wanted to promote the values of Christian marriage, abstinence and morality because this helps build sound societies and safeguard against what he perceives are the social problems caused by single-parent homes. What he stipulated, however, was that it wasn’t the government’s place to impose these values. I don’t know if he planned it, but lucky or not, that was an incredible thing to say.

Part of why liberals are so mortified by many of the Republican candidates is that it seems almost as if they want to tear down the division between church and state. Liberals are afraid to see what the limits of these candidates really are, and sometimes they worry because the Republicans make wildly unrealistic claims. The first point of distinction between being a good candidate and being an average or even sub-par candidate, in my opinion, is assessing the place of government in making moral decisions and understanding the extent of its authority to do so. Conservatives want a moral man; liberals want separation of church and state. The problem is that all the Republican candidates, except Santorum that night, didn’t see that these two were not necessarily mutually exclusive.

Santorum bridged this gap perfectly by saying that he would lead the country through his own example and by his beliefs, but government will not be a means of imposing these beliefs. This is leadership in a sense that seems forgotten. A leader isn’t just a machine that makes decisions and manages the levers of government; he is a social influence, a role model. This is why little boys want to grow up to be like the president. They join the boy scouts, they read Hardy Boys novels, and they aspire to become the president. A leader, in some senses, is this very Boy Scout grown up.

He understands the limitations of his position as leader, but he still has a strong core of values. It is commitment to helping the country that calls him to put aside personal belief when necessary, but it is that belief, that morality, which guides him in his overall plan for the development of the society. During the debate, Santorum said, “I believe this, and I think this is where our society should be heading, but I won’t use the government to force this vision on you.” It is thus that both liberals and conservatives can be courted.

It is tragic that in the few weeks since the debate Santorum has completely lost this message. He has grown increasingly controversial and emphasized his belief that there should not be an absolute separation of Church and State. Considering that this is the complete opposite of what he said on the night of the debate, it would indeed appear that he only happened upon the golden message by accident. Therefore, not much can be said about his relevancy as a feasible candidate. Santorum has figuratively shot himself in the foot by taking such a divisive stance. Furthermore, he may have killed the potential revival of the true Republican message.

A leader is more than just a decision maker. He is a moral role model whose job is, in part, to inspire us to be better people. Understanding the limitations of government, he acts with reserve and good judgment. This is the model the Republican Party seems to have lost. Bowing to the pressures of radical beliefs, they have corrupted this message. This, in turn, has made candidates such as Santorum even less likely to be elected. Republican voters want moral leadership in the White House, but morality without good judgment simply doesn’t lead there

Anchor
Comments
Anonymous (not verified) says:
Wed, 03/14/2012 - 18:37

"The Boy Scouts of America organisation has been at the centre of nearly three decades of controversy ranging from out-of-court settlements with victims of childhood sexual abuse to its bar on non-believers and gay people.

Although Kerry Lewis won the largest punitive damages to date ($18.5m) awarded over sexual molestation, the Scouts in the US have settled about 60 similar cases out of court over recent years.

Until last week's judgment, the Texas-based Scout movement had previously fought off several court actions, including an attempt to overturn its policy that atheists and agnostics who were not prepared to swear allegiance to God could not join. It also beat off legal attempts to force it to drop an effective bar on openly gay members on the grounds that being homosexual is not consistent with the organisation's requirement to be "morally straight". The Girl Scouts of America, a separate organisation, permits members to submit a word other than God when reciting its oath and has no restrictions based on sexual orientation.

Some critics have accused the Boy Scouts of losing touch with its original purpose as it has evolved into a an organisation which in some ways resembles a large corporation, with close to $900m in assets, including a $45m art collection and a large property portfolio."

..................................................................................................................................................................

Just what we need, another moral man.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.